1973 Mazda RX-4 vs. 2010 Holden Barina
To start off, 2010 Holden Barina is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-4 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1973 Mazda RX-4 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1973 Mazda RX-4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Mazda RX-4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Barina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Barina (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda RX-4. (165 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Holden Barina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda RX-4.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Mazda RX-4 | 2010 Holden Barina | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | RX-4 | Barina |
Year Released | 1973 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2616 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 165 Nm | 197 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1650 mm |