1973 Mazda RX-4 vs. 2011 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2011 Volvo XC60 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-4 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1973 Mazda RX-4 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 811 kg more than 1973 Mazda RX-4.
Because 2011 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Mazda RX-4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Mazda RX-4 | 2011 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | RX-4 | XC60 |
Year Released | 1973 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2616 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1921 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1712 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2748 mm |