1973 Mazda RX-4 vs. 2012 Fiat Doblo
To start off, 2012 Fiat Doblo is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-4 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1973 Mazda RX-4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Mazda RX-4 (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2012 Fiat Doblo. (102 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Mazda RX-4 should accelerate faster than 2012 Fiat Doblo.
Because 1973 Mazda RX-4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Mazda RX-4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Fiat Doblo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Mazda RX-4 (165 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Fiat Doblo. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1973 Mazda RX-4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Fiat Doblo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Mazda RX-4 | 2012 Fiat Doblo | |
| Make | Mazda | Fiat |
| Model | RX-4 | Doblo |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Panel Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2616 cc | 1594 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 102 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2570 mm |
