1973 Mercedes-Benz 250 vs. 2002 Oldsmobile Aurora
To start off, 2002 Oldsmobile Aurora is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mercedes-Benz 250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mercedes-Benz 250 would be higher. At 3,995 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Oldsmobile Aurora is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1973 Mercedes-Benz 250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Mercedes-Benz 250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Oldsmobile Aurora, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Mercedes-Benz 250 | 2002 Oldsmobile Aurora | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Oldsmobile |
| Model | 250 | Aurora |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 3995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 247 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
