1973 Mercedes-Benz 280 vs. 1949 Triumph Renown
To start off, 1973 Mercedes-Benz 280 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 2,778 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Mercedes-Benz 280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Mercedes-Benz 280 (160 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1949 Triumph Renown. (67 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Mercedes-Benz 280 should accelerate faster than 1949 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Mercedes-Benz 280 weights approximately 220 kg more than 1949 Triumph Renown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1973 Mercedes-Benz 280 (224 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Triumph Renown. (148 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1973 Mercedes-Benz 280 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Mercedes-Benz 280 | 1949 Triumph Renown | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Triumph |
| Model | 280 | Renown |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2778 cc | 2088 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 224 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86.5 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 78.8 mm | 92 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2750 mm |
