1973 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. At 2,404 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1973 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Mercedes-Benz E | 1996 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mitsubishi |
Model | E | Colt |
Year Released | 1973 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2404 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2430 mm |