1973 Mercury Cougar vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 7,542 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1973 Mercury Cougar. (213 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1973 Mercury Cougar.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Mercury Cougar (498 Nm) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden UTE. (330 Nm). This means 1973 Mercury Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Mercury Cougar | 2010 Holden UTE | |
Make | Mercury | Holden |
Model | Cougar | UTE |
Year Released | 1973 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7542 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 213 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 498 Nm | 330 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |