1973 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1952 Riley RM A
To start off, 1973 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,498 cc, 1973 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Riley RM A weights approximately 325 kg more than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1952 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Mitsubishi Colt | 1952 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Riley |
| Model | Colt | RM A |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1952 |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1496 cc |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2870 mm |
