1973 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1976 Audi 80
To start off, 1976 Audi 80 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Audi 80 (75 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Audi 80 weights approximately 2 kg more than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Mitsubishi Colt (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Audi 80. (112 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1973 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Mitsubishi Colt | 1976 Audi 80 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Audi |
| Model | Colt | 80 |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1588 cc |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 75 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 120 Nm | 112 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 912 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2550 mm |
