1973 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2000 Plymouth Prowler
To start off, 2000 Plymouth Prowler is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 3,507 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Plymouth Prowler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Plymouth Prowler weights approximately 410 kg more than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2000 Plymouth Prowler is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Plymouth Prowler. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Plymouth Prowler (610 Nm) has 490 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm). This means 2000 Plymouth Prowler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Mitsubishi Colt | 2000 Plymouth Prowler | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Plymouth |
| Model | Colt | Prowler |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 3507 cc |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 120 Nm | 610 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2880 mm |
