1973 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2002 Skoda Fabia
To start off, 2002 Skoda Fabia is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,498 cc, 1973 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Skoda Fabia (74 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Skoda Fabia should accelerate faster than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Skoda Fabia weights approximately 164 kg more than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Skoda Fabia (126 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Skoda Fabia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Mitsubishi Colt | 2002 Skoda Fabia | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Skoda |
| Model | Colt | Fabia |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1390 cc |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 120 Nm | 126 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1074 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2470 mm |
