1973 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2006 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 2006 Suzuki Swift is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,498 cc, 1973 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Suzuki Swift (91 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Suzuki Swift should accelerate faster than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Suzuki Swift weights approximately 135 kg more than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Mitsubishi Colt (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Suzuki Swift. (116 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1973 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Suzuki Swift.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Mitsubishi Colt | 2006 Suzuki Swift | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Suzuki |
Model | Colt | Swift |
Year Released | 1973 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1328 cc |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 120 Nm | 116 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1045 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2390 mm |