1973 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2008 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2008 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Toyota Sequoia (381 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 309 more horse power than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 420 kg more than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Sequoia (544 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 424 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota Sequoia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Mitsubishi Colt | 2008 Toyota Sequoia | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
Model | Colt | Sequoia |
Year Released | 1973 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 5663 cc |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 381 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 120 Nm | 544 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 5220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 3110 mm |