1973 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2010 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2010 Kia Cee'd is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,582 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Kia Cee'd is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cee'd (113 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 457 kg more than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Kia Cee'd (255 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Kia Cee'd will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Mitsubishi Colt | 2010 Kia Cee'd | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Kia |
Model | Colt | Cee'd |
Year Released | 1973 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1582 cc |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 120 Nm | 255 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1367 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2660 mm |