1973 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2012 Fiat Croma
To start off, 2012 Fiat Croma is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Fiat Croma (146 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fiat Croma weights approximately 30 kg more than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Fiat Croma (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Fiat Croma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Mitsubishi Colt | 2012 Fiat Croma | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Fiat |
Model | Colt | Croma |
Year Released | 1973 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2198 cc |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 146 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 120 Nm | 203 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2710 mm |