1973 Mitsubishi Jeep vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mitsubishi Jeep. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mitsubishi Jeep would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Mitsubishi Jeep is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ecosport (94 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1973 Mitsubishi Jeep. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1973 Mitsubishi Jeep.
Because 1973 Mitsubishi Jeep is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Mitsubishi Jeep will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Mitsubishi Jeep | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | Jeep | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1973 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 94 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2490 mm |