1973 Mitsubishi Lancer vs. 1964 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 1973 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1964 Reliant Sabre Six is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Mitsubishi Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Mitsubishi Lancer | 1964 Reliant Sabre Six | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Reliant |
| Model | Lancer | Sabre Six |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1600 cc | 2552 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
