1973 Monteverdi 2000 vs. 1980 Volvo 260
To start off, 1980 Volvo 260 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Monteverdi 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Monteverdi 2000 would be higher. At 2,848 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volvo 260 (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1973 Monteverdi 2000. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volvo 260 should accelerate faster than 1973 Monteverdi 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 260 weights approximately 80 kg more than 1973 Monteverdi 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Monteverdi 2000 | 1980 Volvo 260 | |
| Make | Monteverdi | Volvo |
| Model | 2000 | 260 |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1980 |
| Engine Size | 1994 cc | 2848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1370 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2660 mm |
