1973 Nissan Cedric vs. 2002 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2002 Ford Ranger is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,565 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ranger (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1973 Nissan Cedric. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1973 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ranger weights approximately 400 kg more than 1973 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1973 Nissan Cedric (216 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Ranger. (207 Nm). This means 1973 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Nissan Cedric | 2002 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Cedric | Ranger |
Year Released | 1973 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2565 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 216 Nm | 207 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3010 mm |