1973 Nissan Cedric vs. 2008 Seat Exeo
To start off, 2008 Seat Exeo is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,565 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Seat Exeo (148 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1973 Nissan Cedric. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Seat Exeo should accelerate faster than 1973 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Seat Exeo weights approximately 80 kg more than 1973 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Seat Exeo (220 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Nissan Cedric. (216 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Seat Exeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Nissan Cedric | 2008 Seat Exeo | |
Make | Nissan | Seat |
Model | Cedric | Exeo |
Year Released | 1973 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2565 cc | 1781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 216 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4661 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1772 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2642 mm |