1973 NSU 1000 vs. 2012 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2012 Ford Ecosport is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 NSU 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 NSU 1000 would be higher. At 1,000 cc (3 cylinders), 2012 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Ecosport (118 HP) has 80 more horse power than 1973 NSU 1000. (38 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1973 NSU 1000.
Because 1973 NSU 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 NSU 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Ecosport (170 Nm @ 1300 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 NSU 1000. (70 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2012 Ford Ecosport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 NSU 1000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 NSU 1000 | 2012 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | NSU | Ford |
| Model | 1000 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 996 cc | 1000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 118 HP |
| Torque | 70 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
