1973 NSU Ro 80 vs. 2012 BMW M5
To start off, 2012 BMW M5 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 BMW M5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW M5 (560 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 446 more horse power than 1973 NSU Ro 80. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW M5 should accelerate faster than 1973 NSU Ro 80.
Because 2012 BMW M5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 BMW M5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 NSU Ro 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 BMW M5 (680 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 518 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 NSU Ro 80. (162 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2012 BMW M5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 NSU Ro 80.
Compare all specifications:
1973 NSU Ro 80 | 2012 BMW M5 | |
Make | NSU | BMW |
Model | Ro 80 | M5 |
Year Released | 1973 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2390 cc | 4400 cc |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 560 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 162 Nm | 680 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 7-speed automated manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1455 mm |