1973 NSU Ro 80 vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 2,390 cc, 1973 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Cruze (138 HP) has 24 more horse power than 1973 NSU Ro 80. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1973 NSU Ro 80.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 NSU Ro 80 (162 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Cruze. (148 Nm). This means 1973 NSU Ro 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Cruze. 1973 NSU Ro 80 has automatic transmission and 2012 Holden Cruze has manual transmission. 2012 Holden Cruze will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1973 NSU Ro 80 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1973 NSU Ro 80 | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
Make | NSU | Holden |
Model | Ro 80 | Cruze |
Year Released | 1973 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2390 cc | 1364 cc |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 162 Nm | 148 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2685 mm |