1973 Opel Commodore vs. 2002 Peugeot Sesame
To start off, 2002 Peugeot Sesame is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Opel Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Opel Commodore would be higher. At 2,488 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Opel Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Opel Commodore (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2002 Peugeot Sesame. (108 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Opel Commodore should accelerate faster than 2002 Peugeot Sesame.
Because 1973 Opel Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Opel Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Peugeot Sesame, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Opel Commodore (177 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Peugeot Sesame. (150 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1973 Opel Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Peugeot Sesame.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Opel Commodore | 2002 Peugeot Sesame | |
| Make | Opel | Peugeot |
| Model | Commodore | Sesame |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 2488 cc | 1587 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 177 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1640 mm |
