1973 Plymouth Valiant vs. 1996 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1996 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 3,689 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1973 Plymouth Valiant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Plymouth Valiant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Plymouth Valiant | 1996 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Plymouth | Volkswagen |
Model | Valiant | Polo |
Year Released | 1973 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3689 cc | 1389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2410 mm |