1973 Plymouth Valiant vs. 2012 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-V is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 5,213 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1973 Plymouth Valiant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Plymouth Valiant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Plymouth Valiant | 2012 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Plymouth | Honda |
Model | Valiant | CR-V |
Year Released | 1973 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5213 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 184 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1819 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1645 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2620 mm |