1973 Renault 12 vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Renault 12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Renault 12 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1973 Renault 12. (53 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1973 Renault 12.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Toyota Matrix (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Renault 12. (96 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Renault 12.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Renault 12 | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | 12 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1973 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1288 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 96 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2601 mm |