1973 Renault 15 vs. 2009 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2009 Toyota Matrix is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Renault 15. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Renault 15 would be higher. At 2,362 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1973 Renault 15. (59 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1973 Renault 15. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 365 kg more than 1973 Renault 15. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Toyota Matrix (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Renault 15. (98 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Renault 15.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Renault 15 | 2009 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | 15 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1973 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1289 cc | 2362 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 98 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 965 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 50 L |