1973 Renault 5 vs. 2005 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2005 Toyota Matrix is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Renault 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Renault 5 would be higher. At 1,786 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Matrix (130 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1973 Renault 5. (33 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1973 Renault 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 510 kg more than 1973 Renault 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Matrix (170 Nm) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Renault 5. (53 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Renault 5.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Renault 5 | 2005 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Renault | Toyota |
| Model | 5 | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 782 cc | 1786 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 53 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 715 kg | 1225 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2500 mm |
