1973 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2010 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 650 kg more than 2010 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1973 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2010 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Mitsubishi |
Model | Silver Shadow | Colt |
Year Released | 1973 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 1332 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 190 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2150 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 3640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 47 L |