1973 Rover 2000 vs. 2006 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2006 Smart ForFour is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 1,978 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Rover 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Rover 2000 (106 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2006 Smart ForFour. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Rover 2000 should accelerate faster than 2006 Smart ForFour.
Because 1973 Rover 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Rover 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Smart ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Rover 2000 (172 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Smart ForFour. (136 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1973 Rover 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Smart ForFour.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Rover 2000 | 2006 Smart ForFour | |
Make | Rover | Smart |
Model | 2000 | ForFour |
Year Released | 1973 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1978 cc | 1123 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 172 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2510 mm |