1973 Rover 3.5 Litre vs. 2002 BMW Z3

To start off, 2002 BMW Z3 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Rover 3.5 Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Rover 3.5 Litre would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Rover 3.5 Litre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW Z3 (228 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1973 Rover 3.5 Litre. (150 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1973 Rover 3.5 Litre. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Rover 3.5 Litre weights approximately 235 kg more than 2002 BMW Z3.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW Z3 (301 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Rover 3.5 Litre. (276 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2002 BMW Z3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Rover 3.5 Litre.

Compare all specifications:

1973 Rover 3.5 Litre 2002 BMW Z3
Make Rover BMW
Model 3.5 Litre Z3
Year Released 1973 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3532 cc 2996 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 150 HP 228 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 5900 RPM
Torque 276 Nm 301 Nm
Torque RPM 2600 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Vehicle Weight 1635 kg 1400 kg
Vehicle Length 4750 mm 4060 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1550 mm 1300 mm
Wheelbase Size 2820 mm 2450 mm