1973 Seat 1430 vs. 2006 Toyota Ractis
To start off, 2006 Toyota Ractis is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Seat 1430. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Seat 1430 would be higher. At 1,489 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Seat 1430 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1973 Seat 1430 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Seat 1430. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Ractis, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Ractis (158 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Seat 1430. (88 Nm @ 1900 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota Ractis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Seat 1430.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Seat 1430 | 2006 Toyota Ractis | |
Make | Seat | Toyota |
Model | 1430 | Ractis |
Year Released | 1973 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 1299 cc |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 88 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1780 mm |