1973 Simca 1100 vs. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1973 Simca 1100 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1973 Simca 1100. (59 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 1973 Simca 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger weights approximately 230 kg more than 1973 Simca 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Simca 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Simca 1100 | 1966 Sunbeam Tiger | |
| Make | Simca | Sunbeam |
| Model | 1100 | Tiger |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1966 |
| Engine Size | 1116 cc | 4259 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2190 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 27 L |
