1973 Subaru R-2 vs. 2006 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2006 Ford Ecosport is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Subaru R-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Subaru R-2 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 116 more horse power than 1973 Subaru R-2. (27 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1973 Subaru R-2.
Because 1973 Subaru R-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Subaru R-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Subaru R-2 | 2006 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Subaru | Ford |
Model | R-2 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1973 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 356 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 27 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1930 mm | 2490 mm |