1973 Sunbeam Chamois vs. 2000 Volvo S60
To start off, 2000 Volvo S60 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Sunbeam Chamois. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Sunbeam Chamois would be higher. At 2,319 cc (5 cylinders), 2000 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volvo S60 (246 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 1973 Sunbeam Chamois. (36 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1973 Sunbeam Chamois. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Volvo S60 weights approximately 761 kg more than 1973 Sunbeam Chamois. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Volvo S60 (330 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 262 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Sunbeam Chamois. (68 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2000 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Sunbeam Chamois.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Sunbeam Chamois | 2000 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Sunbeam | Volvo |
Model | Chamois | S60 |
Year Released | 1973 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 875 cc | 2319 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 246 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 330 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 715 kg | 1476 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2090 mm | 2800 mm |