1973 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1973 Suzuki Fronte. (33 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1973 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1614 kg more than 1973 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee (318 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 276 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Suzuki Fronte. (42 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Suzuki Fronte | 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Suzuki | Jeep |
Model | Fronte | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1973 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Size | 356 cc | 3700 cc |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 42 Nm | 318 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 486 kg | 2100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4775 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1844 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2020 mm | 2781 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 80 L |