1973 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2010 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover (375 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 342 more horse power than 1973 Suzuki Fronte. (33 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1973 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 2039 kg more than 1973 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover (508 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 466 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Suzuki Fronte. (42 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2010 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Suzuki Fronte | 2010 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Suzuki | Land Rover |
Model | Fronte | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1973 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 355 cc | 5000 cc |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 375 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 42 Nm | 508 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 545 kg | 2584 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4973 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2878 mm |