1973 Suzuki LJ 20 vs. 2011 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2011 Smart ForTwo is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Suzuki LJ 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Suzuki LJ 20 would be higher. At 1,000 cc (3 cylinders), 2011 Smart ForTwo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Smart ForTwo (70 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1973 Suzuki LJ 20. (27 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1973 Suzuki LJ 20.
Because 1973 Suzuki LJ 20 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Smart ForTwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Suzuki LJ 20 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Smart ForTwo (92 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Suzuki LJ 20. (37 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2011 Smart ForTwo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Suzuki LJ 20.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Suzuki LJ 20 | 2011 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | Suzuki | Smart |
| Model | LJ 20 | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 358 cc | 1000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 27 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 37 Nm | 92 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
