1973 Suzuki LJ 20 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Suzuki LJ 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Suzuki LJ 20 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (266 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 239 more horse power than 1973 Suzuki LJ 20. (27 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1973 Suzuki LJ 20.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (373 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 336 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Suzuki LJ 20. (37 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Suzuki LJ 20.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Suzuki LJ 20 | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Suzuki | Cadillac |
| Model | LJ 20 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2013 |
| Engine Size | 358 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 27 HP | 266 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 37 Nm | 373 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
