1973 Toyota Century vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Toyota Century. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Toyota Century would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Toyota Century weights approximately 314 kg more than 2010 Volvo C30.
Because 1973 Toyota Century is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Toyota Century. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo C30 (350 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Toyota Century. (270 Nm). This means 2010 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Toyota Century.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Toyota Century | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | Century | C30 |
Year Released | 1973 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 157 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 270 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1765 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2639 mm |