1973 Triumph 1500 vs. 2010 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2010 Dodge Dakota is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Triumph 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Triumph 1500 would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Dakota (207 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1973 Triumph 1500. (63 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1973 Triumph 1500.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Dakota (236 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Triumph 1500. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Triumph 1500.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Triumph 1500 | 2010 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | Triumph | Dodge |
Model | 1500 | Dakota |
Year Released | 1973 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1492 cc | 3701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 106 Nm | 236 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 73.7 mm | 87.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87.5 mm | 100 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 5560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 83 L |