1973 Triumph 2000 vs. 2011 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2011 Cadillac CTS is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 1973 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1973 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 496 kg more than 1973 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm @ 5700 RPM) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2011 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Triumph 2000 | 2011 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Triumph | Cadillac |
Model | 2000 | CTS |
Year Released | 1973 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 302 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1248 kg | 1744 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2880 mm |