1973 Triumph Dolomite vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Triumph Dolomite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Triumph Dolomite would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Triumph Dolomite is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Triumph Dolomite (124 HP) has 30 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Triumph Dolomite should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1973 Triumph Dolomite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Triumph Dolomite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Triumph Dolomite | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Triumph | Ford |
Model | Dolomite | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1973 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 94 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2490 mm |