1973 Triumph Dolomite vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Triumph Dolomite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Triumph Dolomite would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (187 HP) has 63 more horse power than 1973 Triumph Dolomite. (124 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1973 Triumph Dolomite.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (450 Nm) has 282 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Triumph Dolomite. (168 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Triumph Dolomite.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Triumph Dolomite | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Triumph | Jaguar |
Model | Dolomite | XF |
Year Released | 1973 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 187 HP |
Torque | 168 Nm | 450 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 70 L |