1973 Triumph Stag vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1973 Triumph Stag is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Triumph Stag is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Triumph Stag (124 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Triumph Stag should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Triumph Stag weights approximately 30 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1973 Triumph Stag (192 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1973 Triumph Stag will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Triumph Stag | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Triumph | Triumph |
Model | Stag | 2000 |
Year Released | 1973 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2997 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 192 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2700 mm |