1973 TVR M vs. 2010 Chevrolet HHR
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 TVR M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 TVR M would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet HHR weights approximately 536 kg more than 1973 TVR M.
Because 1973 TVR M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 TVR M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 TVR M | 2010 Chevrolet HHR | |
| Make | TVR | Chevrolet |
| Model | M | HHR |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 155 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1431 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4475 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1755 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1603 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2629 mm |
