1973 TVR M vs. 2011 Mazda 2
To start off, 2011 Mazda 2 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 TVR M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 TVR M would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 TVR M is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda 2 weights approximately 205 kg more than 1973 TVR M.
Because 1973 TVR M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 TVR M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 TVR M | 2011 Mazda 2 | |
Make | TVR | Mazda |
Model | M | 2 |
Year Released | 1973 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 95 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2489 mm |