1973 TVR M vs. 2012 Mazda 5
To start off, 2012 Mazda 5 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 TVR M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 TVR M would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 5 weights approximately 655 kg more than 1973 TVR M.
Because 1973 TVR M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 TVR M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 TVR M | 2012 Mazda 5 | |
| Make | TVR | Mazda |
| Model | M | 5 |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 157 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4585 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1615 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2751 mm |
