1973 Volvo 164 vs. 2006 Acura CSX
To start off, 2006 Acura CSX is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 2,976 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 55 more horse power than 1973 Volvo 164. (142 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 1973 Volvo 164. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Volvo 164 weights approximately 47 kg more than 2006 Acura CSX.
Because 1973 Volvo 164 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Volvo 164. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Acura CSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Volvo 164 | 2006 Acura CSX | |
Make | Volvo | Acura |
Model | 164 | CSX |
Year Released | 1973 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2976 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2700 mm |